Anne Sonnet

510 citations
5 papers · 96 · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

Anne Sonnet

3 papers receiving 79 citations

Peers

Anne Sonnet
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Demography 49
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 4
  • General Health Professions 54
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 3
  • Economics and Econometrics 32
Replace Alexandre Georgieff with:
Alexandre Georgieff France
Emma Quinn Ireland
Alexia Fürnkranz-Prskawetz Austria
Joshua Mitchell United States
John W. R. Phillips United States
Georges Lemaître France
Parvati Trübswetter Germany
Ingemar Svensson Sweden
Zovanga L. Kone United Kingdom
Thomas Biegert Germany
Anne Sonnet relative to Alexandre Georgieff France Alexandre Georgieff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Alexandre Georgieff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Sonnet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Sonnet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Sonnet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Sonnet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Sonnet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Sonnet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Sonnet. The network helps show where Anne Sonnet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Anne Sonnet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Sonnet Line = papers co-authored together Anne Sonnet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1 201449
2 201238
3
Ageing and employment policies = Vieillissement et politiques de l'emploi : Italy. Paris : OCDE, 2004
20047
4 19821
5 19831

About Anne Sonnet

Anne Sonnet is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Demography, Political Science and International Relations and Education, having authored 5 papers that have together received 96 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (2 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (2 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (1 paper), Firm Innovation and Growth (1 paper), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (1 paper), Regional Development and Policy (1 paper), Employment and Welfare Studies (1 paper) and Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (49 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (4 citations), General Health Professions (54 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (3 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (32 citations). Anne Sonnet has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Spain and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Manfredi, Imanol Núñez, Ilias Livanos, Xueda Song, Stéfano Scarpetta, W. Craig Riddell, Andrea Baranzini, Giovanni Luzzi and Robert Leroy. Their work appears in journals such as Intereconomics, De Economist, Courrier hebdomadaire du CRISP and ArODES (HES-SO (https://www.hes-so.ch/)).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact