Anne McQueen

18 papers receiving 779 citations

Peers

Anne McQueen
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Research and Theory 69
  • Leadership and Management 22
  • Social Psychology 292
  • General Health Professions 265
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 47
Replace María del Carmen Giménez‐Espert with:
María del Carmen Giménez‐Espert Spain
Nicolle P. G. Boumans Netherlands
Alireza Yousefy Iran
Olcay Çam Türkiye
Patricia M. Schwirian United States
Ester Carolina Apesoa‐Varano United States
Ruby Shaw Morrison United States
Ana Soto‐Rubio Spain
Mohamed Ali Zoromba Egypt
Gerard Jansen Netherlands
Anne McQueen relative to María del Carmen Giménez‐Espert Spain María del Carmen Giménez‐Espert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
María del Carmen Giménez‐Espert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne McQueen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne McQueen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne McQueen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne McQueen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne McQueen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne McQueen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne McQueen. The network helps show where Anne McQueen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Anne McQueen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne McQueen Line = papers co-authored together Anne McQueen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2004352
2 2005135
3 2000113
4 201068
5 200366
6 200730
7 199426
8 199721
9 201020
10 19979
11 20137
12 20116
13 20095
14
Perspectives in Cancer Care
20115
15
Perspectives On Cancer Care
20102
16 19972
17 20092
18 20112
19
Midwives: still pushing for recognition.
19861

About Anne McQueen

Anne McQueen is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Education and Social Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 872 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Support in Illness (3 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (2 papers), Education, Leadership, and Health Research (2 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers), Palliative and Oncologic Care (2 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers) and Health, Nursing, Elderly Care (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (69 citations), Leadership and Management (22 citations), Social Psychology (292 citations), General Health Professions (265 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (47 citations). Anne McQueen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Cristina García‐Vivar, Rosemary Mander, Miguel Piña e Cunha, Arménio Rego, Dorothy A. Whyte, Tonks N Fawcett, Navidad Canga‐Armayor and Josephine N. Fawcett. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Nurse Researcher, Service Industries Journal and Nurse Education Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact