Anne Gates
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
- Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
- Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Motor Control and Adaptation
-
- Multisensory perception and integration
Papers in
-
- Neuroscience and Music Perception 5
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation 3
- Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism 2
- Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction 2
- Music 3
- Diverse Music Education Insights 3
- Co-authors
- John L. Bradshaw (8 shared papers)Norman C. Nettleton (2 shared papers)Kay Patterson (2 shared papers)Brian Byrne (1 shared paper)Peter Freebody (1 shared paper)Dianne Bradley (1 shared paper)Robert A. M. Gregson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Cortex (1 paper)Brain and Language (1 paper)Biological Cybernetics (1 paper)Reading Research Quarterly (1 paper)British Journal of Psychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Australia
In The Last Decade
Anne Gates
10 papers receiving 592 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Cognitive Neuroscience 530
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 224
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 191
- Statistics and Probability 65
- Music 18
Countries citing papers authored by Anne Gates
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Gates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Gates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Gates more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Gates
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Gates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Gates. The network helps show where Anne Gates may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Anne Gates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1977 | 154 | |
| 2 | 1977 | 106 | |
| 3 | 1977 | 106 | |
| 4 | 1992 | 99 | |
| 5 | 1976 | 92 | |
| 6 | 1977 | 49 | |
| 7 | 1974 | 32 | |
| 8 | 1974 | 22 | |
| 9 | 1975 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1985 | 1 |
About Anne Gates
Anne Gates is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Music, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Automotive Engineering, having authored 10 papers that have together received 665 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (5 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (3 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (3 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (2 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers), Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (2 papers) and Phonetics and Phonology Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (530 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (224 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (191 citations), Statistics and Probability (65 citations) and Music (18 citations). Anne Gates has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include John L. Bradshaw, Norman C. Nettleton, Kay Patterson, Brian Byrne, Peter Freebody, Dianne Bradley and Robert A. M. Gregson. Their work appears in journals such as Cortex, Brain and Language, Biological Cybernetics, Reading Research Quarterly and British Journal of Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.