Anne Gärtner

989 citations
35 papers · 358 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Anne Gärtner

30 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers

Anne Gärtner
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • General Psychology 14
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 105
  • Applied Psychology 31
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 82
  • Clinical Psychology 72
Replace J. C. Brengelmann with:
J. C. Brengelmann United Kingdom
Sanja Franić Netherlands
Brian M. Monroe United States
W. Burt Thompson United States
Annemarie Eigenhuis Netherlands
Torstein Låg Norway
Kimberly Goodyear United States
Ivan Ropovik Slovakia
Alessandro Carollo Italy
Marko Paelecke Germany
Anne Gärtner relative to J. C. Brengelmann United Kingdom J. C. Brengelmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×58×
J. C. Brengelmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Gärtner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Gärtner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Gärtner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Gärtner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Gärtner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Gärtner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Gärtner. The network helps show where Anne Gärtner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anne Gärtner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Gärtner Line = papers co-authored together Anne Gärtner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202144
2 201933
3 201929
4 202227
5 201826
6 201825
7 202119
8 201419
9 201719
10 202415
11 202015
12 202114
13 201610
14 20228
15 20216
16 20226
17 20216
18 20185
19 20205
20 20234

About Anne Gärtner

Anne Gärtner is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Education, having authored 35 papers that have together received 358 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (8 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Education Methods and Technologies (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers) and Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (14 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (105 citations), Applied Psychology (31 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (82 citations) and Clinical Psychology (72 citations). Anne Gärtner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and France. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Strobel, Alexander Behnke, Felix D. Schönbrodt, Denise Dörfel, Daniel Leising, Anja Strobel, Isabel Thielmann, Andreas Glöckner, Roberto Rojas and Iris‐Tatjana Kolassa. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cognition, Personality and Individual Differences, Physiology & Behavior, PLoS ONE and Trials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact