Anne Gärtner

827 citations
42 papers · 444 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Anne Gärtner

34 papers receiving 429 citations

Peers

Anne Gärtner
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • General Psychology 23
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 106
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 114
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 10
  • Applied Psychology 19
Replace Samantha Erin Williams with:
Samantha Erin Williams United States
Lianne P. de Vries Netherlands
Susan M. Kemp-Wheeler United Kingdom
Tiago O. Paiva Portugal
Charity Brown United Kingdom
Joel P. Redfield United States
Cassie Stutts United States
Suzanne Stewart United Kingdom
Cassandra M Brandes United States
Bethany Rebecca Wainwright United Kingdom
Anne Gärtner relative to Samantha Erin Williams United States Samantha Erin Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Samantha Erin Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Gärtner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Gärtner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Gärtner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Gärtner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Gärtner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Gärtner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Gärtner. The network helps show where Anne Gärtner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anne Gärtner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Gärtner Line = papers co-authored together Anne Gärtner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202153
2 202338
3 201934
4 201931
5 202231
6 201828
7 202123
8 201419
9 202318
10 202017
11 202017
12 202417
13 202115
14 201611
15 20219
16 20229
17 20218
18 20206
19 20216
20 20226

About Anne Gärtner

Anne Gärtner is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and General Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (11 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (9 papers), Psychology Research and Bibliometrics (7 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (4 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (3 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (3 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (23 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (106 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (114 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (10 citations) and Applied Psychology (19 citations). Anne Gärtner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Strobel, Felix D. Schönbrodt, Daniel Leising, Denise Dörfel, Alexander Behnke, Anja Strobel, Isabel Thielmann, Andreas Glöckner, Roberto Rojas and Iris‐Tatjana Kolassa. Their work appears in journals such as Trials, eLife, Psychophysiology, Brain and Cognition and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact