Constance Holman

29 papers receiving 957 citations

Peers

Constance Holman
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Hematology 320
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 44
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 28
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 169
  • Information Systems and Management 52
Replace Terri H. Beaty with:
Terri H. Beaty United States
Jill Oliver Robinson United States
Vibha Anand United States
Karen E Birmingham United Kingdom
Ashley P Jones United Kingdom
Linda L. McCabe United States
Carla Pettenati Italy
John M. Belmont United States
Alison M. Elliott Canada
William J. Arnold United States
Constance Holman relative to Terri H. Beaty United States Terri H. Beaty's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×14.7×
Terri H. Beaty · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Constance Holman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Constance Holman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constance Holman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constance Holman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Constance Holman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constance Holman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constance Holman. The network helps show where Constance Holman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Constance Holman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Constance Holman Line = papers co-authored together Constance Holman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1981186
2 2015159
3 2012149
4 201688
5 196081
6 195356
7 202246
8 200743
9 195734
10 201334
11 200533
12 201723
13 202318
14 202015
15 196412
16 201410
17 19669
18 20219
19 20239
20 19568

About Constance Holman

Constance Holman is a scholar working on Hematology, Information Systems and Management, Biochemistry, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood groups and transfusion (7 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (6 papers), Blood transfusion and management (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Research Data Management Practices (3 papers), Data Quality and Management (2 papers), Research, Science, and Academia (2 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (320 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (44 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (28 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (169 citations) and Information Systems and Management (52 citations). Constance Holman has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David N. Whitmore, Charles H. Rodeck, Karen Lowton, Mary Flatley, Caroline Jane Nicholson, Julienne Elizabeth Meyer, Franziska Bender, Xiaojie Gao, Tatiana M. Korotkova and Natalia P. Denisova. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Wellcome Open Research, Journal of Clinical Pathology, PLoS Biology and BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact