M. Pfingsten

5.2k citations
116 papers · 3.3k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

M. Pfingsten

113 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

M. Pfingsten
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Pharmacology 2.6k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.1k
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 326
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 701
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 301
Replace Peter H. T. G. Heuts with:
Peter H. T. G. Heuts Netherlands
J. Hildebrandt Germany
James Rainville United States
Nathalie Roussel Belgium
Sidney M. Rubinstein Netherlands
Markus Hübscher Australia
Janna Friedly United States
Heikki Hurri Finland
Emilio J. Puentedura United States
Alan Breen United Kingdom
M. Pfingsten relative to Peter H. T. G. Heuts Netherlands Peter H. T. G. Heuts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Peter H. T. G. Heuts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Pfingsten

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Pfingsten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Pfingsten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Pfingsten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Pfingsten

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Pfingsten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Pfingsten. The network helps show where M. Pfingsten may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Pfingsten, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Pfingsten Line = papers co-authored together M. Pfingsten links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 116 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007267
2 2010239
3 1997206
4 2002195
5 2017172
6 2000169
7 1997109
8 200991
9 200189
10 201484
11 200867
12 199664
13 200860
14 200858
15 199957
16 201457
17 201354
18 201253
19 201147
20 201447

About M. Pfingsten

M. Pfingsten is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Surgery, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 116 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (91 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (48 papers), Biomedical and Chemical Research (20 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (20 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (16 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (14 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (12 papers) and Pain Management and Opioid Use (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (2.6k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.1k citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (326 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (701 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (301 citations). M. Pfingsten has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include J. Hildebrandt, Jean‐François Chenot, Eric Leibing, B. Nagel, Petra Saur, Gabriele Lindena, Frank Petzke, Thomas Kohlmann, Annette Becker and Corinna Leonhardt. Their work appears in journals such as Spine, Der Schmerz, Pain Medicine, Clinical Journal of Pain and European Journal of Pain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact