Anne E. Smith

2.0k citations
42 papers · 1.4k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Anne E. Smith

40 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Anne E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • General Decision Sciences 68
  • Applied Psychology 147
  • Clinical Psychology 279
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 88
  • Physiology 162
Replace Kimberly Horn with:
Kimberly Horn United States
Diann E. Gaalema United States
Christopher T. Franck United States
Nina Schneider United States
Clodagh O’Gorman Ireland
Liesbeth van Osch Netherlands
Frank van Dijk Netherlands
Andrea Waylen United Kingdom
Andrew J. Barnes United States
Richard A. LaBrie United States
Anne E. Smith relative to Kimberly Horn United States Kimberly Horn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kimberly Horn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne E. Smith. The network helps show where Anne E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anne E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Anne E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006328
2 1999179
3 2010131
4 200976
5 199972
6 200955
7 199052
8 201352
9 200848
10 200747
11 200940
12 201033
13 200927
14 200923
15 201622
16 200922
17 200820
18 200818
19 199316
20 199515

About Anne E. Smith

Anne E. Smith is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Physiology, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Air Quality and Health Impacts (9 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (7 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (6 papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (5 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (4 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers), Vehicle emissions and performance (3 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (68 citations), Applied Psychology (147 citations), Clinical Psychology (279 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (88 citations) and Physiology (162 citations). Anne E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include Suchitra Krishnan‐Sarin, Dana A. Cavallo, Marc N. Potenza, Amanda McFetridge, Thomas Liss, Amy Duhig, Kathleen M. Carroll, Brady Reynolds, Jean M. Sanger and Erika Swift. Their work appears in journals such as Risk Analysis, Journal of Addiction Medicine, PLoS ONE, Dermatology and Environmental Health Perspectives.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact