Fraser Smith

3.3k citations
69 papers · 2.2k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Fraser Smith

63 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Fraser Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 167
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 157
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.1k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 488
  • Sensory Systems 70
  • Social Psychology 240
Replace Philip T. Reiss with:
Philip T. Reiss United States
Albert A. Harrison United States
Lee F. Schroeder United States
Sebastian Wallot Germany
Rodrick Wallace United States
Gary Jones United Kingdom
Gary L. Hansen United States
Robert E. Morrison United States
Joseph Wilder United States
Jinbo He China
Fraser Smith relative to Philip T. Reiss United States Philip T. Reiss's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
Philip T. Reiss · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fraser Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fraser Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fraser Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fraser Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fraser Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fraser Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fraser Smith. The network helps show where Fraser Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fraser Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fraser Smith Line = papers co-authored together Fraser Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977266
2 2015265
3 2014201
4 2010142
5 2009131
6 2011129
7 1964121
8 201896
9 201878
10 199977
11 200868
12 201350
13 201850
14 201144
15 201841
16 200840
17 198540
18 201936
19 201934
20 201833

About Fraser Smith

Fraser Smith is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Civil and Structural Engineering, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Atmospheric Science, having authored 69 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (13 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (13 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (12 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers), Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis (6 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (6 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (5 papers) and Climate change and permafrost (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (157 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.1k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (488 citations), Sensory Systems (70 citations) and Social Psychology (240 citations). Fraser Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lars Muckli, J. W. Getzels, Mihály Csíkszentmihályi, Philippe G. Schyns, Petra Vetter, Lucy S. Petro, John A. Barker, Charles Harris, Paul Flowers and Mark Davis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, Scientific Reports, NeuroImage and Neuropsychologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact