Fraser Smith

633 citations
20 papers · 491 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Fraser Smith

16 papers receiving 436 citations

Peers

Fraser Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 172
  • Pharmacology 84
  • Statistics and Probability 55
  • Physiology 70
  • Genetics 70
Replace Raluca Mihăescu with:
Raluca Mihăescu Netherlands
Cayetano Alegre Spain
Pranali Yogiraj Khobragade United States
Alexandra C. Gillett United Kingdom
Fran Webley United Kingdom
Amanda Ly United Kingdom
Carmela C. Janagap United States
Helene C. W. Rytgaard Denmark
Carolyn Plater Canada
Vishaal Mehra United States
Fraser Smith relative to Raluca Mihăescu Netherlands Raluca Mihăescu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
Raluca Mihăescu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fraser Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fraser Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fraser Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fraser Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fraser Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fraser Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fraser Smith. The network helps show where Fraser Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fraser Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fraser Smith Line = papers co-authored together Fraser Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 1996246
2 199267
3 201554
4 202044
5 200125
6 200715
7 199612
8 199611
9 19895
10 20042
11 20212
12 20222
13 20222
14 19971
15 20201
16 20221
17
Common Paths in Medical Education: An Updated Look at the Training of Allopathic, Osteopathic, and Naturopathic Physicians.
20221
18 20130
19 20220
20 20250

About Fraser Smith

Fraser Smith is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Statistics and Probability, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology and Health Informatics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 491 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (5 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (3 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (3 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Cleft Lip and Palate Research (2 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (1 paper) and Medical research and treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (172 citations), Pharmacology (84 citations), Statistics and Probability (55 citations), Physiology (70 citations) and Genetics (70 citations). Fraser Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen I. Gracon, Sheela Talwalker, Kenneth L. Davis, David S. Knopman, Toni M. Hoover, Lon S. S. Schneider, Ronald P. Strauss, Hillary L. Broder, Julian J. O’Rear and William L. Ince. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal and Statistics in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact