Acta Sociologica

1.7k papers and 25.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Acta Sociologica in the last decades have received a total of 25.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Acta Sociologica usually cover Sociology and Political Science (723 papers), Political Science and International Relations (320 papers) and General Health Professions (148 papers) specifically the topics of Social Policy and Reform Studies (191 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (129 papers) and Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies (105 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta Sociologica are Mark Granovetter, Reza Azarian, Сара Ферландер, Mikael Hjerm, Richard Swedberg, Mads Meier Jæger, Ron Eyerman, M.H.J. Wolbers, John Gelissen and Robert S. Erikson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Acta Sociologica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta Sociologica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta Sociologica.

Countries where authors publish in Acta Sociologica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta Sociologica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta Sociologica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta Sociologica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025