Anna Rockhill

14 papers receiving 322 citations

Peers

Anna Rockhill
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Safety Research 150
  • Clinical Psychology 184
  • Public Administration 26
  • General Health Professions 165
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 100
Replace Nora S. Gustavsson with:
Nora S. Gustavsson United States
Laura F. Radel United States
Sam Choi United States
Michael Finigan United States
Lenette Azzi‐Lessing United States
Peter Choate Canada
Miriam Maclean Australia
Donna J. Cherry United States
Martin Manby United Kingdom
Kelli Connell‐Carrick United States
Anna Rockhill relative to Nora S. Gustavsson United States Nora S. Gustavsson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Nora S. Gustavsson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Rockhill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Rockhill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Rockhill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Rockhill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Rockhill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Rockhill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Rockhill. The network helps show where Anna Rockhill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Anna Rockhill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Rockhill Line = papers co-authored together Anna Rockhill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2006102
2
The role of interagency collaboration for substance-abusing families involved with child welfare.
200863
3 200640
4
Accessing substance abuse treatment: issues for parents involved with child welfare services.
200834
5 199432
6 200724
7 201820
8
Peer Mentoring in Child Welfare: A Motivational Framework.
201511
9 20205
10 20235
11 20184
12 20232
13 20231
14
Waiver III: Parent Mentor & Relationship Based Visitation
20151

About Anna Rockhill

Anna Rockhill is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Safety Research, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Welfare and Adoption (6 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (5 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (5 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (3 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper) and Youth Development and Social Support (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (150 citations), Clinical Psychology (184 citations), Public Administration (26 citations), General Health Professions (165 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (100 citations). Anna Rockhill has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Beth L. Green, Carrie Furrer, Scott Burrus, Meda Chesney‐Lind, Peggy Nygren, Ericka Kimball, Christine Cooper, Amanda Brown Cross and John MacArthur. Their work appears in journals such as Children and Youth Services Review, Child Maltreatment, Families in Society The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse and Health & Social Work.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact