Peter Choate

32 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers

Peter Choate
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Public Administration 52
  • Health 59
  • Clinical Psychology 151
  • Safety Research 61
  • General Health Professions 120
Replace An‐Pyng Sun with:
An‐Pyng Sun United States
Dana M. Hollinshead United States
Lana O. Beasley United States
James R. Moran United States
Joanne Filippelli Canada
Miriam Maclean Australia
Rebecca O’Reilly Australia
Debra Allnock United Kingdom
Kelli Connell‐Carrick United States
Lenette Azzi‐Lessing United States
Peter Choate relative to An‐Pyng Sun United States An‐Pyng Sun's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.8×
An‐Pyng Sun · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Choate

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Choate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Choate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Choate more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Choate

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Choate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Choate. The network helps show where Peter Choate may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Peter Choate, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Choate Line = papers co-authored together Peter Choate links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201542
2 201442
3 201835
4 201923
5 202221
6 201119
7 202118
8 201915
9 201514
10 202012
11 202212
12 202110
13 202110
14 20199
15 20218
16 20227
17
Psychometrics in Parenting Capacity Assessments – A problem for First Nations parents
20157
18 20206
19 20235
20 20184

About Peter Choate

Peter Choate is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Health and Safety Research, having authored 37 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (16 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (13 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (12 papers), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (10 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (8 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (6 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (52 citations), Health (59 citations), Clinical Psychology (151 citations), Safety Research (61 citations) and General Health Professions (120 citations). Peter Choate has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Dorothy Badry, Bruce MacLaurin, Alan McLuckie, Andrew C. H. Szeto, Jacqueline Smith, Katherine Bright, Jennifer Smith, Sarah Orton, Lenora Marcellus and Ana Hanlon‐Dearman. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, The British Journal of Social Work, Journal of Social Work Education, Social Sciences and Child Care in Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact