Kelli Connell‐Carrick

583 citations
13 papers · 374 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Kelli Connell‐Carrick

13 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers

Kelli Connell‐Carrick
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Public Administration 72
  • Safety Research 144
  • Clinical Psychology 225
  • Health 49
  • General Health Professions 133
Replace Jane Dodsworth with:
Jane Dodsworth United Kingdom
Donna J. Cherry United States
Debbie Noble‐Carr Australia
Nora S. Gustavsson United States
Rosamund Thorpe Australia
Reiko Boyd United States
Cathryn C. Potter United States
Kathleen Kufeldt Canada
Virginia C. Strand United States
Judith Harwin United Kingdom
Kelli Connell‐Carrick relative to Jane Dodsworth United Kingdom Jane Dodsworth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Jane Dodsworth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kelli Connell‐Carrick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kelli Connell‐Carrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kelli Connell‐Carrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kelli Connell‐Carrick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kelli Connell‐Carrick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kelli Connell‐Carrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kelli Connell‐Carrick. The network helps show where Kelli Connell‐Carrick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Kelli Connell‐Carrick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kelli Connell‐Carrick Line = papers co-authored together Kelli Connell‐Carrick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 200770
2 200358
3
Child welfare workplace: the state of the workforce and strategies to improve retention.
200855
4 200634
5 200531
6 200526
7 201220
8 200218
9
Trends in popular parenting books and the need for parental critical thinking.
200718
10 200717
11
Methamphetamine and the changing face of child welfare: practice principles for child welfare workers.
200711
12 20089
13 20157

About Kelli Connell‐Carrick

Kelli Connell‐Carrick is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Safety Research, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Health, having authored 13 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (9 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (6 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (4 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (3 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (2 papers), Elder Abuse and Neglect (2 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (2 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (72 citations), Safety Research (144 citations), Clinical Psychology (225 citations), Health (49 citations) and General Health Professions (133 citations). Kelli Connell‐Carrick has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Maria Scannapieco, Kirstin Painter and Rebecca L. Hegar. Their work appears in journals such as Children and Youth Services Review, Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, Substance Use & Misuse, Journal of Interpersonal Violence and Gerontology & Geriatrics Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact