Anna Popenko

20 papers receiving 694 citations

Peers

Anna Popenko
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Biological Psychiatry 28
  • Physiology 199
  • Gastroenterology 39
  • Molecular Biology 513
  • Infectious Diseases 85
Replace Laura Petcu with:
Laura Petcu Romania
Benjamin Pontefract United States
Ariana Picu Romania
Cody A. Black United States
Rosario López Spain
Ana Carolina Franco de Moraes Brazil
Robin Shields‐Cutler United States
Jana De Bodt Belgium
Wen Su China
Anna Popenko relative to Laura Petcu Romania Laura Petcu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Laura Petcu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Popenko

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Popenko's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Popenko with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Popenko more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Popenko

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Popenko. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Popenko. The network helps show where Anna Popenko may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Popenko, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Popenko Line = papers co-authored together Anna Popenko links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015149
2 2016106
3 201896
4 201874
5 201967
6 201643
7 201436
8 201135
9 201832
10 202020
11
Agent Based Modeling of Human Gut Microbiome Interactions and Perturbations
201612
12 201712
13 20158
14 20175
15 20125
16 20154
17 20123
18 20143
19 20202
20 20241

About Anna Popenko

Anna Popenko is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology, Food Science, Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 26 papers that have together received 713 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gut microbiota and health (23 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (9 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (6 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (5 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (3 papers), Pediatric health and respiratory diseases (2 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (2 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (28 citations), Physiology (199 citations), Gastroenterology (39 citations), Molecular Biology (513 citations) and Infectious Diseases (85 citations). Anna Popenko has collaborated with scholars based in Russia, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Dmitry Alexeev, Alexander Tyakht, Д. А. Каштанова, S. А. Boytsov, Elena Kostryukova, Natalia Klimenko, Vadim M. Govorun, L. V. Egshatyan, Vladislav V. Babenko and Maria T Vakhitova. Their work appears in journals such as Nutrients, Gut Microbes, Nutrition, PLoS ONE and European Heart Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact