Anna Leask

2.3k citations
60 papers · 1.8k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Leask

58 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Anna Leask
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 139
  • Transportation 321
  • Geography, Planning and Development 233
  • Museology 138
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.4k
Replace Deepak Chhabra with:
Deepak Chhabra United States
Hilary du Cros Hong Kong
Richard Butler United Kingdom
Avital Biran United Kingdom
Hazel Tucker New Zealand
Philip Feifan Xie United States
A. V. Seaton United Kingdom
Myriam Jansen‐Verbeke Netherlands
Michelle Whitford Australia
Rami K. Isaac Netherlands
Anna Leask relative to Deepak Chhabra United States Deepak Chhabra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Deepak Chhabra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Leask

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Leask's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Leask with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Leask more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Leask

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Leask. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Leask. The network helps show where Anna Leask may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Leask, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Leask Line = papers co-authored together Anna Leask links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009180
2 2006179
3 2016123
4 2010106
5 2016102
6 201191
7 201269
8 201169
9
Heritage Visitor Attractions: An Operations Management Perspective
199963
10 201661
11 200659
12 201358
13 200145
14 200945
15 201741
16 200240
17 202039
18 201236
19 201426
20 201725

About Anna Leask

Anna Leask is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Transportation, Social Psychology, Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management and Museology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research (36 papers), Cruise Tourism Development and Management (19 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (17 papers), Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (13 papers), Hospitality and Tourism Education (12 papers), Museums and Cultural Heritage (8 papers), Conferences and Exhibitions Management (6 papers) and Religious Tourism and Spaces (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (139 citations), Transportation (321 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (233 citations), Museology (138 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (1.4k citations). Anna Leask has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Alan Fyall, Paul Barron, Brian Garrod, John Ensor, Ian Yeoman, Sambath Phou, Ching‐Fu Chen, Adi Weidenfeld, Martin Robertson and Tijana Rakić. Their work appears in journals such as Tourism Management, International Journal of Tourism Research, Current Issues in Tourism, Journal of Heritage Tourism and Tourism Recreation Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact