Anna Francesconi

1.2k citations
26 papers · 917 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Francesconi

26 papers receiving 909 citations

Peers

Anna Francesconi
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 504
  • Transplantation 29
  • Molecular Biology 586
  • Developmental Neuroscience 31
  • Cell Biology 118
Replace Ora Dillon‐Carter with:
Ora Dillon‐Carter United States
R. Brusa Italy
Hsing‐Lin Lai Taiwan
Chyn‐Tair Lan Taiwan
Gabriele Ugolini Italy
Karla Kretschmannova United States
Tenpei Akita Japan
Régine Hepp France
Michaela Kraus Austria
Nadia Jaafari United Kingdom
Anna Francesconi relative to Ora Dillon‐Carter United States Ora Dillon‐Carter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.7×
Ora Dillon‐Carter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Francesconi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Francesconi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Francesconi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Francesconi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Francesconi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Francesconi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Francesconi. The network helps show where Anna Francesconi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Francesconi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Francesconi Line = papers co-authored together Anna Francesconi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004150
2 1998136
3 2000104
4 2009100
5 200272
6 201035
7 201634
8 201334
9 201533
10 200330
11 200529
12 199328
13 201024
14 201522
15 199318
16 200917
17 199211
18 20038
19 20117
20 20156

About Anna Francesconi

Anna Francesconi is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cell Biology, Genetics and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 26 papers that have together received 917 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (12 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (7 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (3 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (3 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (3 papers), Caveolin-1 and cellular processes (3 papers) and Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (504 citations), Transplantation (29 citations), Molecular Biology (586 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (31 citations) and Cell Biology (118 citations). Anna Francesconi has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Robert M. Duvoisin, R. Suzanne Zukin, Ranju Kumari, Michael V. L. Bennett, Vytenis Arvydas Skeberdis, Ying Lin, Magdalena Kalinowska, Francesco Amaldi, Yukihiro Takayasu and Andrés E. Chávez. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Nucleic Acids Research, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Gene.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact