Zakia Hammal

1.9k citations
51 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Zakia Hammal

49 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Zakia Hammal
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 609
  • Applied Psychology 103
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 349
  • Pharmacy 79
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 289
Replace Sharifa Alghowinem with:
Sharifa Alghowinem United States
Sebastian Schnieder Germany
Jarek Krajewski Germany
Giota Stratou United States
Emily Mower Provost United States
Giorgos Giannakakis Greece
Matthew Pediaditis Greece
Jeffrey M. Girard United States
Beena Ahmed Qatar
Jyoti Joshi Australia
Zakia Hammal relative to Sharifa Alghowinem United States Sharifa Alghowinem's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Sharifa Alghowinem · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Zakia Hammal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Zakia Hammal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zakia Hammal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zakia Hammal more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Zakia Hammal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zakia Hammal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zakia Hammal. The network helps show where Zakia Hammal may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Zakia Hammal, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Zakia Hammal Line = papers co-authored together Zakia Hammal links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013185
2 2017128
3 2012118
4 201866
5 201561
6 201554
7 200753
8 201153
9 201539
10 201838
11 201433
12 201428
13 201727
14 200522
15 201922
16 202020
17 200813
18 201812
19 200912
20 201412

About Zakia Hammal

Zakia Hammal is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Pharmacology and Physiology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emotion and Mood Recognition (23 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (11 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (10 papers), Face recognition and analysis (9 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (8 papers), Face and Expression Recognition (7 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers) and Infant Health and Development (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (609 citations), Applied Psychology (103 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (349 citations), Pharmacy (79 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (289 citations). Zakia Hammal has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey F. Cohn, Hamdi Dibeklioğlu, Mohammad H. Mahoor, Jeffrey M. Girard, S. Mohammad Mavadati, Miriam Kunz, Daniel S. Messinger, Ying Yang, Alice Caplier and Michèle Rombaut. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, Image and Vision Computing and Information Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact