Anna E. Paul

1.4k citations
46 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Anna E. Paul

40 papers receiving 1k citations

Peers

Anna E. Paul
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 234
  • Oncology 312
  • Clinical Psychology 171
  • Genetics 200
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 11
Replace Denise Shuk Ting Cheung with:
Denise Shuk Ting Cheung Hong Kong
Ana Myriam Lavín Pérez Spain
Heather Hancock United States
Ingvard Wilhelmsen Norway
Elizabeth D. Hathaway United States
Mahendra Kumar United States
Laura C. Seidman United States
Celso Silva United States
Miriam Schocken United States
Anna E. Paul relative to Denise Shuk Ting Cheung Hong Kong Denise Shuk Ting Cheung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×28.6×
Denise Shuk Ting Cheung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna E. Paul

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna E. Paul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna E. Paul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna E. Paul more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna E. Paul

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna E. Paul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna E. Paul. The network helps show where Anna E. Paul may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna E. Paul, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna E. Paul Line = papers co-authored together Anna E. Paul links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012181
2 2005146
3 201487
4 200584
5 200783
6 201146
7 201344
8 201542
9 202035
10 201233
11 201333
12 201331
13 201326
14 201125
15 202025
16 201222
17 201220
18 201320
19 201514
20 202013

About Anna E. Paul

Anna E. Paul is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Oncology, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (18 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (16 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (8 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (4 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (3 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (3 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (3 papers) and Dietary Effects on Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (234 citations), Oncology (312 citations), Clinical Psychology (171 citations), Genetics (200 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (11 citations). Anna E. Paul has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Holger Cramer, Gustav Dobos, Jost Langhorst, Gustav J. Dobos, Andreas Michalsen, Silke Lange, Romy Lauche, Petra Klose, Rainer Lüdtke and Sherko Kümmel. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Cancer, Integrative Cancer Therapies, Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Trials and Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact