Thomas Budde

2.7k citations
38 papers · 1.8k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Budde

38 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Thomas Budde
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 724
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 538
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 126
  • Surgery 267
  • Nephrology 43
Replace Gian Francesco Mureddu with:
Gian Francesco Mureddu Italy
Donald F. Leon United States
Claudia Walther Germany
Alf Inge Larsen Norway
Carmen Teodorescu United States
Frances C. O’Connor United States
J. P. Bagger Denmark
Demetrios Georgiou United States
M. Huonker Germany
Juha Mustonen Finland
Thomas Budde relative to Gian Francesco Mureddu Italy Gian Francesco Mureddu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Gian Francesco Mureddu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Budde

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Budde's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Budde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Budde more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Budde

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Budde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Budde. The network helps show where Thomas Budde may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Budde, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Budde Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Budde links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008327
2 2003307
3 2006180
4 2010168
5 2014130
6 2005113
7 200582
8 201463
9 201363
10 201362
11 201627
12 201125
13 201024
14 200823
15 200620
16 201919
17 201718
18 200618
19 201117
20 201915

About Thomas Budde

Thomas Budde is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Epidemiology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (11 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (6 papers), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (4 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (4 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (3 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (2 papers), Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity (2 papers) and Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (724 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (538 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (126 citations), Surgery (267 citations) and Nephrology (43 citations). Thomas Budde has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Nils Lehmann, Raimund Erbel, Jörg Barkhausen, Susanne Moebus, Stefan Möhlenkamp, Axel Schmermund, Gerd Heusch, Gert Kerkhoff, Martina Bröcker‐Preuß and Karl‐Heinz Jöckel. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Atherosclerosis, Basic Research in Cardiology, European Heart Journal and Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact