Anna Coates
Impact in
- Marketing top 5%
- Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Human-Computer Interaction top 10%
Papers in
-
- Digital Marketing and Social Media 3
-
- Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet 3
- Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling 3
- Co-authors
- E. Boyland (9 shared papers)Paul Christiansen (4 shared papers)Jason C. G. Halford (5 shared papers)Charlotte A. Hardman (4 shared papers)Frans Folkvord (1 shared paper)Brigitte Naderer (1 shared paper)Claire Noble (1 shared paper)Thea Cameron‐Faulkner (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (1 paper)Perception (1 paper)Nature Reviews Endocrinology (1 paper)Nutrients (1 paper)Pediatric Obesity (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
Anna Coates
12 papers receiving 621 citations
Anna Coates's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Marketing 124
- Human-Computer Interaction 56
- Sociology and Political Science 297
- Applied Psychology 27
- Communication 40
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Coates
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Coates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Coates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Coates more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Coates
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Coates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Coates. The network helps show where Anna Coates may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Coates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Social Media Influencer Marketing and Children’s Food Intake: A Randomized Trial Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 237 |
| 2 | 2019 | 102 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 102 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 36 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 35 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2025 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 1 |
About Anna Coates
Anna Coates is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Marketing and Education, having authored 12 papers that have together received 642 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (3 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (3 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (2 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (1 paper) and Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (124 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (56 citations), Sociology and Political Science (297 citations), Applied Psychology (27 citations) and Communication (40 citations). Anna Coates has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include E. Boyland, Paul Christiansen, Jason C. G. Halford, Charlotte A. Hardman, Frans Folkvord, Brigitte Naderer, Claire Noble, Thea Cameron‐Faulkner, Caroline F. Rowland and Jasmin Knopp. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Perception, Nature Reviews Endocrinology, Nutrients and Pediatric Obesity.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.