Beth T. Bell

1.3k citations
29 papers · 774 · h-index 14

Impact in

    • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
    • Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
    • Gender, Feminism, and Media
    • Media, Gender, and Advertising

Papers in

Beth T. Bell

27 papers receiving 741 citations

Peers

Beth T. Bell
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Clinical Psychology 370
  • Gender Studies 168
  • Pharmacy 54
  • Applied Psychology 55
  • Marketing 104
Replace Jolanda Veldhuis with:
Jolanda Veldhuis Netherlands
Dian A. de Vries Netherlands
Alyssa Saiphoo Canada
Gayle R. Bessenoff United States
Zahra Vahedi Canada
Yuki Fujioka United States
Sarah E. Vaala United States
Courtney Heldreth United States
Linda M. Kaczor United States
Jessica Salvatore United States
Beth T. Bell relative to Jolanda Veldhuis Netherlands Jolanda Veldhuis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Jolanda Veldhuis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beth T. Bell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth T. Bell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth T. Bell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth T. Bell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth T. Bell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth T. Bell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth T. Bell. The network helps show where Beth T. Bell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beth T. Bell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beth T. Bell Line = papers co-authored together Beth T. Bell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017125
2 2018102
3 201186
4 201970
5 200766
6 201963
7 201961
8 202125
9 201524
10 201624
11 202123
12 201417
13 202014
14 201913
15 202110
16 20218
17 20147
18 20247
19 20136
20 20224

About Beth T. Bell

Beth T. Bell is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Education and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 29 papers that have together received 774 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (11 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (6 papers), Media Influence and Health (6 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (5 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers) and Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (370 citations), Gender Studies (168 citations), Pharmacy (54 citations), Applied Psychology (55 citations) and Marketing (104 citations). Beth T. Bell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Helga Dittmar, Rebecca Lawton, Róisín McNaney, Daniel Fitton, Sarah Clinch, Linda Little, Michael Smith, Megan Hurst, Dan Fitton and Julio Vega. Their work appears in journals such as Body Image, Journal of Adolescent Research, Journal of Health Psychology, Psychology of Popular Media and International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact