Anna Arlinghaus

23 papers receiving 433 citations

Peers

Anna Arlinghaus
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 141
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 41
  • Occupational Therapy 32
  • General Health Professions 165
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 66
Replace Rebecca M. Brossoit with:
Rebecca M. Brossoit United States
Ljiljana Kaliterna Croatia
Jialin Fan China
Ana Slišković Croatia
Gintare Visockaite United Kingdom
Élise Ledoux Canada
Eva Bamberg Germany
Jennifer K. Coffeng Netherlands
Fabián Javier Marín Rueda Brazil
Anna Arlinghaus relative to Rebecca M. Brossoit United States Rebecca M. Brossoit's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
Rebecca M. Brossoit · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Arlinghaus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Arlinghaus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Arlinghaus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Arlinghaus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Arlinghaus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Arlinghaus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Arlinghaus. The network helps show where Anna Arlinghaus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Arlinghaus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Arlinghaus Line = papers co-authored together Anna Arlinghaus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201995
2 201465
3 201359
4 201255
5 201640
6 201231
7 201330
8 201419
9 201613
10 201512
11 201312
12 20147
13 20127
14
Wissensarbeit: Aktuelle arbeitswissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse
20176
15 20215
16 20203
17 20143
18 20212
19 20122
20 20192

About Anna Arlinghaus

Anna Arlinghaus is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Pharmacology and Social Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 477 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Workplace Health and Well-being (16 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (12 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (8 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (3 papers), Innovation, Technology, and Society (2 papers), Sleep and related disorders (2 papers) and Occupational Health and Safety Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (141 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (41 citations), Occupational Therapy (32 citations), General Health Professions (165 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (66 citations). Anna Arlinghaus has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Friedhelm Nachreiner, David A. Lombardi, Simon Folkard, Sarah M. Jay, Lúcia Rotenberg, Irena Iskra‐Golec, Nicole Jansen, David C. Christiani, Philip Bohle and Joanna Willetts. Their work appears in journals such as Chronobiology International, Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, Industrial Health and Vaccine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact