Robert Northcott
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 20
-
- Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference 4
- Co-authors
- Anna Alexandrova (2 shared papers)Ed Diener (1 shared paper)Stephen G. West (1 shared paper)Michael J. Zyphur (1 shared paper)Gualtiero Piccinini (1 shared paper)Martin Peterson (1 shared paper)José Luis Bermúdez (1 shared paper)David Gauthier (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophy of Science (4 papers)Journal of Economic Methodology (3 papers)Synthese (3 papers)Analysis (2 papers)Philosophical Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Robert Northcott
28 papers receiving 319 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- History and Philosophy of Science 141
- General Decision Sciences 20
- Philosophy 65
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 48
- Applied Psychology 17
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Northcott
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Northcott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Northcott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Northcott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Northcott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Northcott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Northcott. The network helps show where Robert Northcott may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Robert Northcott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 69 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 44 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 29 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 8 | |
| 16 | Conceived This Way: Innateness Defended | 2018 | 7 |
| 17 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 6 |
About Robert Northcott
Robert Northcott is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Artificial Intelligence, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science and Philosophy, having authored 30 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (20 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (4 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (2 papers), Free Will and Agency (2 papers) and Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (141 citations), General Decision Sciences (20 citations), Philosophy (65 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (48 citations) and Applied Psychology (17 citations). Robert Northcott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Anna Alexandrova, Ed Diener, Stephen G. West, Michael J. Zyphur, Gualtiero Piccinini, Martin Peterson, José Luis Bermúdez, David Gauthier, Charles A. Holt and Paul Weirich. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, Journal of Economic Methodology, Synthese, Analysis and Philosophical Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.