James Friedrich

32 papers receiving 785 citations

Peers

James Friedrich
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • General Decision Sciences 182
  • General Psychology 41
  • Applied Psychology 96
  • Safety Research 158
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 221
Replace Michael E. Enzle with:
Michael E. Enzle Canada
Anna Alexandrova United Kingdom
Jean‐Léon Beauvois France
Fiore Sicoly Canada
Mário B. Ferreira Portugal
Victor A. Harris United States
Clayton R. Critcher United States
Harvey A. Hornstein United States
Elizabeth R. Tenney United States
David A. Houston United States
James Friedrich relative to Michael E. Enzle Canada Michael E. Enzle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Michael E. Enzle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Friedrich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Friedrich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Friedrich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Friedrich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Friedrich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Friedrich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Friedrich. The network helps show where James Friedrich may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside James Friedrich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Friedrich Line = papers co-authored together James Friedrich links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997245
2 1993141
3 200576
4 199970
5 199646
6 201038
7 199635
8 200031
9 199021
10 199819
11 200817
12 200916
13 199616
14 198913
15 202212
16 199311
17 20188
18 19988
19 20058
20 20057

About James Friedrich

James Friedrich is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Decision Sciences, Social Psychology, Education and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 873 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (10 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (8 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (3 papers), Statistics Education and Methodologies (3 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (3 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (182 citations), General Psychology (41 citations), Applied Psychology (96 citations), Safety Research (158 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (221 citations). James Friedrich has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Slovic, Stephen Johnson, Gale Lucas, David Kerr, Paul Barnes, Ian Dawson, Anthony D. Hermann, Dennis J. Gallagher, Lon R. Cardon and Sean Casey. Their work appears in journals such as American Psychologist, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Journal of Counseling Psychology and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact