Thomas Gast

1.1k citations
41 papers · 843 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Gast

37 papers receiving 820 citations

Peers

Thomas Gast
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Ophthalmology 490
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 340
  • Biophysics 38
  • Internal Medicine 13
  • Epidemiology 122
Replace Oleg Pomerantzeff with:
Oleg Pomerantzeff United States
Franz Fankhauser Switzerland
Zhangyi Zhong United States
Phillip Bedggood Australia
Walter J. Geeraets United States
Pooja Godara United States
Andreas W. Dreher United States
Francesco LaRocca United States
Stacey S. Choi United States
Dirk‐Uwe Bartsch United States
Thomas Gast relative to Oleg Pomerantzeff United States Oleg Pomerantzeff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Oleg Pomerantzeff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Gast

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Gast's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Gast with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Gast more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Gast

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Gast. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Gast. The network helps show where Thomas Gast may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Gast, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Gast Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Gast links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018190
2 2014115
3 201399
4 201442
5 201637
6 201735
7 197833
8 202133
9 201628
10 201522
11 201921
12 201619
13 201419
14 201517
15 198514
16 201713
17 202211
18 200911
19 202111
20 201910

About Thomas Gast

Thomas Gast is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Epidemiology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 41 papers that have together received 843 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (13 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (8 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (3 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (3 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (3 papers), Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques (2 papers) and Color Science and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (490 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (340 citations), Biophysics (38 citations), Internal Medicine (13 citations) and Epidemiology (122 citations). Thomas Gast has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Stephen A. Burns, Ann E. Elsner, Toco Yuen Ping Chui, Kaitlyn Sapoznik, Raymond L. Warner, Chris Clark, Victor E. Malinovsky, Dean A. VanNasdale, Gang Huang and Ting Luo. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Optometry and Vision Science, Biomedical Optics Express, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics and Translational Vision Science & Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact