Anke H. W. Essing
Impact in
- Developmental Neuroscience top 10%
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Papers in
-
- Retinal Development and Disorders 5
- Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms 2
-
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 2
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 2
- Co-authors
- Joost Verhaagen (4 shared papers)Arthur A. Bergen (5 shared papers)Koen Bossers (3 shared papers)Peter J. van der Spek (5 shared papers)Jacoline B. ten Brink (4 shared papers)Chris G. Kruse (1 shared paper)Dick F. Swaab (1 shared paper)Gideon F. Meerhoff (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (4 papers)BMC Genomics (1 paper)Glia (1 paper)Journal of Neuroscience (1 paper)Brain (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsSwedenIndia
In The Last Decade
Anke H. W. Essing
13 papers receiving 599 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Developmental Neuroscience 70
- Ophthalmology 135
- Neurology 114
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 163
- Biological Psychiatry 22
Countries citing papers authored by Anke H. W. Essing
This map shows the geographic impact of Anke H. W. Essing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anke H. W. Essing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anke H. W. Essing more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anke H. W. Essing
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anke H. W. Essing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anke H. W. Essing. The network helps show where Anke H. W. Essing may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anke H. W. Essing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 200 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 66 | |
| 3 | Comparison of human retinal pigment epithelium gene expression in macula and periphery highlights potential topographic differences in Bruch's membrane. | 2007 | 56 |
| 4 | 2008 | 53 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 45 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 36 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 30 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 29 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 22 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 6 |
About Anke H. W. Essing
Anke H. W. Essing is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Oncology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 602 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (5 papers), Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (3 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers), Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (2 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (70 citations), Ophthalmology (135 citations), Neurology (114 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (163 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (22 citations). Anke H. W. Essing has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Sweden and India. Frequent co-authors include Joost Verhaagen, Arthur A. Bergen, Koen Bossers, Peter J. van der Spek, Jacoline B. ten Brink, Chris G. Kruse, Dick F. Swaab, Gideon F. Meerhoff, Pieter H.J. Houba and Sigrid Swagemakers. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, BMC Genomics, Glia, Journal of Neuroscience and Brain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.