Angus Phillips
Impact in
-
- Library Science and Administration
-
- Publishing and Scholarly Communication
Papers in
-
- Publishing and Scholarly Communication 7
-
- Library Collection Development and Digital Resources 3
- Web and Library Services 2
- Co-authors
- Bill Cope (4 shared papers)Adriaan van der Weel (2 shared papers)Mark N. K. Saunders (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Publishing Research Quarterly (6 papers)Logos (6 papers)Journal of Scholarly Publishing (2 papers)Art Design & Communication in Higher Education (1 paper)Cambridge University Press eBooks (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGreece
In The Last Decade
Angus Phillips
24 papers receiving 184 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Library and Information Sciences 17
- History and Philosophy of Science 40
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 36
- Communication 29
- Literature and Literary Theory 42
Countries citing papers authored by Angus Phillips
This map shows the geographic impact of Angus Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Angus Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Angus Phillips more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Angus Phillips
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Angus Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Angus Phillips. The network helps show where Angus Phillips may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Angus Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 47 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 36 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 26 | |
| 4 | The future of the book in the digital age | 2006 | 17 |
| 5 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 2 |
About Angus Phillips
Angus Phillips is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Information Systems, Communication, Marketing and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 31 papers that have together received 242 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Publishing and Scholarly Communication (7 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (3 papers), Digital Games and Media (2 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (2 papers), Copyright and Intellectual Property (2 papers), Wikis in Education and Collaboration (2 papers), Web and Library Services (2 papers) and Literature Analysis and Criticism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (17 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (40 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (36 citations), Communication (29 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (42 citations). Angus Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Bill Cope, Adriaan van der Weel and Mark N. K. Saunders. Their work appears in journals such as Publishing Research Quarterly, Logos, Journal of Scholarly Publishing, Art Design & Communication in Higher Education and Cambridge University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.