Leo Appleton

442 citations
31 papers · 268 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Leo Appleton

31 papers receiving 237 citations

Peers

Leo Appleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Library and Information Sciences 129
  • Information Systems and Management 47
  • Information Systems 152
  • Computer Science Applications 18
  • History and Philosophy of Science 14
Replace Barbara Blummer with:
Barbara Blummer United States
Karin de Jager South Africa
Susan Gardner Australia
Jane Secker United Kingdom
Yasmeen Shorish United States
Sarah Barbara Watstein United States
Peggy Johnson United States
Diljit Singh Malaysia
Connie Van Fleet United States
Shane Nackerud United States
Leo Appleton relative to Barbara Blummer United States Barbara Blummer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Barbara Blummer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leo Appleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leo Appleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leo Appleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leo Appleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leo Appleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leo Appleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leo Appleton. The network helps show where Leo Appleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Leo Appleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leo Appleton Line = papers co-authored together Leo Appleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200444
2 201126
3 200626
4 200519
5 201816
6 200516
7 201614
8 202012
9 201312
10 201711
11 20189
12 20128
13 20237
14 20226
15 20186
16 20236
17 20036
18
Libraries and Key Performance Indicators: A Framework for Practitioners
20174
19 20213
20 20103

About Leo Appleton

Leo Appleton is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Information Systems, Education, Sociology and Political Science and Communication, having authored 31 papers that have together received 268 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (12 papers), Library Science and Administration (11 papers), Web and Library Services (8 papers), Higher Education Practises and Engagement (3 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (3 papers), Online and Blended Learning (3 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (3 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (129 citations), Information Systems and Management (47 citations), Information Systems (152 citations), Computer Science Applications (18 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (14 citations). Leo Appleton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Russia and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Hazel Hall, Abigail Jones, Alistair S. Duff, Robert Raeside and Sue Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as New Review of Academic Librarianship, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, The Electronic Library, Health Information & Libraries Journal and Library Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact