Leo Appleton

451 citations
39 papers · 301 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Leo Appleton

37 papers receiving 266 citations

Peers

Leo Appleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Library and Information Sciences 134
  • Information Systems and Management 48
  • Information Systems 156
  • Computer Science Applications 20
  • Communication 23
Replace Karin de Jager with:
Karin de Jager South Africa
Susan Gardner Australia
Diljit Singh Malaysia
Rachel Applegate United States
Connie Van Fleet United States
Peggy Johnson United States
Jane Secker United Kingdom
Okon E. Ani Nigeria
Carla J. Stoffle United States
Robert E. Dugan United States
Leo Appleton relative to Karin de Jager South Africa Karin de Jager's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Karin de Jager · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leo Appleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leo Appleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leo Appleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leo Appleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leo Appleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leo Appleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leo Appleton. The network helps show where Leo Appleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Leo Appleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leo Appleton Line = papers co-authored together Leo Appleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200446
2 201127
3 200627
4 200520
5 201819
6 200518
7 201315
8 202015
9 201615
10 201712
11 20129
12 20239
13 20189
14 20227
15 20036
16 20236
17 20186
18 20224
19 20104
20 20214

About Leo Appleton

Leo Appleton is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Information Systems, Education, Sociology and Political Science and Communication, having authored 39 papers that have together received 301 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (13 papers), Library Science and Administration (11 papers), Web and Library Services (9 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (5 papers), Online and Blended Learning (3 papers), Art Education and Development (3 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (3 papers) and Museums and Cultural Heritage (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (134 citations), Information Systems and Management (48 citations), Information Systems (156 citations), Computer Science Applications (20 citations) and Communication (23 citations). Leo Appleton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Russia and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Hazel Hall, Robert Raeside, Alistair S. Duff, Abigail Jones and Sue Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as New Review of Academic Librarianship, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Health Information & Libraries Journal, Library Management and The Electronic Library.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact