Andrew Procter

4.2k citations
56 papers · 2.4k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Andrew Procter

55 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Andrew Procter
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Biological Psychiatry 142
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 979
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 476
  • Pharmacology 494
  • Physiology 717
Replace Garry Blessed with:
Garry Blessed United Kingdom
Pierre Étienne Canada
Pamela White United Kingdom
C. G. Gottfries Sweden
P. Slater United Kingdom
Hans Jörg Möbius Germany
C H van Dyck United States
Egemen Savaskan Switzerland
Ottavio V. Vitolo United States
C. Hock Switzerland
Andrew Procter relative to Garry Blessed United Kingdom Garry Blessed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Garry Blessed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Procter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Procter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Procter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Procter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Procter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Procter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Procter. The network helps show where Andrew Procter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Procter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Procter Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Procter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993201
2 1988179
3 1988170
4 1989137
5 1988124
6 1988119
7 1999112
8 1986107
9 1989104
10 201395
11 199283
12 198974
13 199166
14 199365
15 199259
16 198957
17 200757
18 199155
19 199352
20 198749

About Andrew Procter

Andrew Procter is a scholar working on Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Molecular Biology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 56 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (18 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (18 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (14 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (9 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (4 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (4 papers) and Computational Drug Discovery Methods (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (142 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (979 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (476 citations), Pharmacology (494 citations) and Physiology (717 citations). Andrew Procter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Paul T. Francis, David M. Bowen, Gary C. Stratmann, D. M. Bowen, Alan M. Palmer, Stephen L. Lowe, Elaine Murphy, A. Najlerahim, Neil R. Sims and David Neary. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Biochemical Society Transactions, Journal of Neurochemistry, Age and Ageing and Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact