Andrew Krumerman

1.5k citations
71 papers · 960 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Andrew Krumerman

62 papers receiving 950 citations

Peers

Andrew Krumerman
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 754
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 120
  • Internal Medicine 17
  • Health Informatics 7
  • Molecular Biology 229
Replace Theo M. Hoorntje with:
Theo M. Hoorntje Netherlands
Enrico Rosati Italy
Jack E. Smith United States
Michael P. Carboni United States
Arthur A.M. Wilde Netherlands
Göran Kennebäck Sweden
Emmanuel Drouin France
Henrik Rüffert Germany
Antonella Spinelli Italy
Horst Wedekind Germany
Andrew Krumerman relative to Theo M. Hoorntje Netherlands Theo M. Hoorntje's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Theo M. Hoorntje · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Krumerman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Krumerman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Krumerman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Krumerman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Krumerman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Krumerman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Krumerman. The network helps show where Andrew Krumerman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Krumerman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Krumerman Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Krumerman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004127
2 201677
3 200271
4 200461
5 200657
6 201640
7 201639
8 201537
9 201729
10 201928
11 200824
12 201523
13 202021
14 201721
15 202019
16 201517
17 201716
18 201515
19 201415
20 201414

About Andrew Krumerman

Andrew Krumerman is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 71 papers that have together received 960 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (29 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (16 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (16 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (8 papers), ECG Monitoring and Analysis (5 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (3 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers) and Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (754 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (120 citations), Internal Medicine (17 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations) and Molecular Biology (229 citations). Andrew Krumerman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Yonathan F. Melman, Thomas V. McDonald, John D. Fisher, Luigi Di Biase, Kevin J. Ferrick, Anna Kagan, Eugen Palma, Sung Yon Um, Jay Gross and Jorge Romero. Their work appears in journals such as Heart Rhythm, The American Journal of Cardiology, Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology and Circulation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact