Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

10.4k papers and 154.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 10.4k papers published in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology in the last decades have received a total of 154.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (9.7k papers), Surgery (1.6k papers) and Neurology (506 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (7.1k papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (6.2k papers) and Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (4.3k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology are Harry G. Mond, Seymour Furman, W. Irnich, Melvin M. Scheinman, Charles Antzelevitch, A. John Camm, David E. Haines, Marek Malík, Alessandro Proclemer and S. Serge Barold.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology.

Countries where authors publish in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025