Andreas Laich

34 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Andreas Laich
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Biological Psychiatry 283
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 127
  • Immunology 339
  • Hematology 110
  • Genetics 66
Replace J Hooton with:
J Hooton Canada
Gabriele Baier‐Bitterlich Austria
N. Matsuoka Japan
Marlon P. Quinones United States
Matilde Leon‐Ponte Canada
Maria Sąsiadek Poland
Peta J. O’Connell United States
Séverine Remy France
Peter Stenzel United States
Edyta Pawlak Poland
Andreas Laich relative to J Hooton Canada J Hooton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
J Hooton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andreas Laich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andreas Laich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andreas Laich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andreas Laich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andreas Laich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andreas Laich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andreas Laich. The network helps show where Andreas Laich may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andreas Laich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andreas Laich Line = papers co-authored together Andreas Laich links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002201
2 2003182
3 2002178
4 200078
5 200371
6 200454
7 200350
8 200245
9 200245
10 200731
11 199530
12 201130
13 200129
14
ICln: a chloride channel paramount for cell volume regulation.
199628
15 199625
16 199721
17 200816
18 200515
19 199815
20 199915

About Andreas Laich

Andreas Laich is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Immunology, Hematology, Oncology and Epidemiology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complement system in diseases (6 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (4 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (4 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (4 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (4 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (3 papers), Blood groups and transfusion (3 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (283 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (127 citations), Immunology (339 citations), Hematology (110 citations) and Genetics (66 citations). Andreas Laich has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Dietmar Fuchs, Bernhard Widner, Robert B. Sim, Gabriele Neurauter, Barbara Sperner‐Unterweger, Maximilian Ledochowski, Barbara Wirleitner, Martin Gschwentner, Markus Paulmichl and Beryl E. Moffatt. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Society Transactions, The Journal of Immunology, Kidney International, Protein Expression and Purification and Oncogene.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact