Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology

1.0k papers and 7.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology in the last decades have received a total of 7.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology usually cover Philosophy (676 papers), Clinical Psychology (447 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (232 papers) specifically the topics of Mental Health and Psychiatry (597 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (234 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (85 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology are Thomas Fuchs, Louis A. Sass, Shaun Gallagher, Peter Zachar, John Campbell, Josef Parnas, Giovanni Stanghellini, Louis C. Charland, Max Coltheart and Nick Haslam.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025