Mark S. Micale

25 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers

Mark S. Micale
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • General Psychology 47
  • Neurology 113
  • History 123
  • Clinical Psychology 207
  • Philosophy 107
Replace Ian Dowbiggin with:
Ian Dowbiggin Canada
L. S. Jacyna United Kingdom
Nathan G. Hale United States
Owsei Temkin United States
Ludwig Binswanger
Peter McCandless United States
Ben Shephard
Allen Esterson United Kingdom
K. R. Eissler United States
Jonathan Sadowsky United States
Mark S. Micale relative to Ian Dowbiggin Canada Ian Dowbiggin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Ian Dowbiggin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark S. Micale

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark S. Micale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark S. Micale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark S. Micale more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark S. Micale

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark S. Micale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark S. Micale. The network helps show where Mark S. Micale may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Mark S. Micale, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark S. Micale Line = papers co-authored together Mark S. Micale links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199561
2 199354
3 201043
4 200841
5 200135
6 199034
7 198928
8 198522
9
The Mind of Modernism: Medicine, Psychology, and the Cultural Arts in Europe and America, 1880-1940
200322
10 199022
11 199617
12 199514
13 199810
14 20149
15 19898
16
Charcot and Les Névroses Traumatiques: historical and scientific reflections.
19958
17 20217
18 19967
19
Enlightenment, Passion, Modernity: Historical Essays in European Thought and Culture
20006
20 20146

About Mark S. Micale

Mark S. Micale is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Neurology, Philosophy, History and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 31 papers that have together received 469 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (12 papers), Neurology and Historical Studies (10 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (7 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (4 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (3 papers), Historical and Scientific Studies (3 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (3 papers) and Augustinian Studies and Theology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (47 citations), Neurology (113 citations), History (123 citations), Clinical Psychology (207 citations) and Philosophy (107 citations). Mark S. Micale has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Roy Porter, Paul Lerner, John C. Burnham, Philip Dwyer, Judith M. Hughes, Caroline Cox, Greg Eghigian, Paul Lerner and Peter Leese. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, History of Science, Medical History and The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact