Stijn Conix
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 17
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 10
- Co-authors
- Steven De Peuter (3 shared papers)Frank E. Zachos (9 shared papers)Kevin R. Thiele (6 shared papers)Mark J. Costello (6 shared papers)Peter Paul van Dijk (6 shared papers)Stephen T. Garnett (7 shared papers)Les Christidis (7 shared papers)Richard L. Pyle (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Organisms Diversity & Evolution (6 papers)Synthese (2 papers)PLoS Biology (1 paper)History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumAustriaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Stijn Conix
24 papers receiving 275 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Ecological Modeling 127
- History and Philosophy of Science 51
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 56
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 72
- Paleontology 19
Countries citing papers authored by Stijn Conix
This map shows the geographic impact of Stijn Conix's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stijn Conix with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stijn Conix more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stijn Conix
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stijn Conix. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stijn Conix. The network helps show where Stijn Conix may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stijn Conix, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 69 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 30 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 3 |
About Stijn Conix
Stijn Conix is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation, History and Philosophy of Science, Genetics and Plant Science, having authored 26 papers that have together received 296 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Species Distribution and Climate Change (17 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Botanical Studies and Applications (5 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (3 papers), Plant and animal studies (3 papers), Academic integrity and plagiarism (2 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (127 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (51 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (56 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (72 citations) and Paleontology (19 citations). Stijn Conix has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Austria and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Steven De Peuter, Frank E. Zachos, Kevin R. Thiele, Mark J. Costello, Peter Paul van Dijk, Stephen T. Garnett, Les Christidis, Richard L. Pyle, Scott Thomson and Zhi‐Qiang Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Organisms Diversity & Evolution, Synthese, PLoS Biology, History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.