Ana Bracic

410 citations
17 papers · 225 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
    • Gender Politics and Representation
    • Gender Diversity and Inequality
    • Gender Roles and Identity Studies

Papers in

Ana Bracic

14 papers receiving 215 citations

Peers

Ana Bracic
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Health Informatics 14
  • Gender Studies 75
  • Political Science and International Relations 69
  • Sociology and Political Science 89
  • General Health Professions 23
Replace Carolyn McKay with:
Carolyn McKay Australia
Gunhild Hoogensen Norway
Atreyee Sen Denmark
Mutuma Ruteere South Africa
Raùl Magni-Berton France
Josip Glaurdić Luxembourg
LaFleur Stephens-Dougan United States
Amelia Hoover Green United States
Karla J. Cunningham United States
Verônica Toste Daflon Brazil
Ana Bracic relative to Carolyn McKay Australia Carolyn McKay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Carolyn McKay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ana Bracic

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ana Bracic's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana Bracic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana Bracic more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ana Bracic

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana Bracic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana Bracic. The network helps show where Ana Bracic may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Ana Bracic, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ana Bracic Line = papers co-authored together Ana Bracic links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201879
2 201136
3 202118
4 201816
5 202215
6 202014
7 201914
8 201614
9 20235
10 20224
11 20223
12 20203
13 20223
14 20201
15 20250
16 20260
17
Breaking the Exclusion Cycle: How to Promote Cooperation between Majority and Minority Ethnic Groups
20200

About Ana Bracic

Ana Bracic is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 225 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Politics and Representation (4 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (3 papers), Romani and Gypsy Studies (3 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (2 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (2 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (2 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (14 citations), Gender Studies (75 citations), Political Science and International Relations (69 citations), Sociology and Political Science (89 citations) and General Health Professions (23 citations). Ana Bracic has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Allyson F. Shortle, W. Nicholson Price, Amanda Murdie, Shawneequa Callier, G.T. Montelione, J.F. Hunt, Philip C. Manor, Burkhard Rost, Rong Xiao and Samuel K. Handelman. Their work appears in journals such as PS Political Science & Politics, The Journal of Politics, Political Science Quarterly, Policy Studies Journal and Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact