Ana Aznar

570 citations
19 papers · 323 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 6
    • Family Caregiving in Mental Illness 1
    • Early Childhood Education and Development 5

Ana Aznar

18 papers receiving 311 citations

Peers

Ana Aznar
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Clinical Psychology 144
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 79
  • Education 103
  • Social Psychology 67
  • Pharmacy 12
Replace Ju‐Hyun Song with:
Ju‐Hyun Song United States
Melissa M. Menzer United States
Imac Maria Zambrana Norway
Marta Giménez‐Dasí Spain
Efrat Sher‐Censor Israel
Tracy G. Cassels Canada
Paloma Braza Spain
Laura Quintanilla Spain
Sharon K. Hall United States
Eva Costa Martins Portugal
Ana Aznar relative to Ju‐Hyun Song United States Ju‐Hyun Song's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Ju‐Hyun Song · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ana Aznar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ana Aznar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana Aznar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana Aznar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ana Aznar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana Aznar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana Aznar. The network helps show where Ana Aznar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ana Aznar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ana Aznar Line = papers co-authored together Ana Aznar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201456
2 200553
3 201349
4 201733
5 201930
6 201920
7 202119
8 202113
9 201710
10 201610
11 20189
12 20146
13 20225
14 20224
15 20153
16 20241
17 20241
18
Are there gender differences in emotion understanding? Analysis of the Test of Emotion Understanding
20171
19 20190

About Ana Aznar

Ana Aznar is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 323 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (5 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (5 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (1 paper) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (144 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (79 citations), Education (103 citations), Social Psychology (67 citations) and Pharmacy (12 citations). Ana Aznar has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include Harriet R. Tenenbaum, Ángel M. Fidalgo, Patrick J. Leman, Amy Warhurst, Sarah Bayless, Paul T. Sowden, Melanie Killen, Jo Van Herwegen, Vladimir López and Maria L. Escolar. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Journal of Child and Family Studies, Sex Roles, Journal of Communication Disorders and Emotion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact