Amélie Prigent
Impact in
Papers in
-
- Health Policy Implementation Science 1
- Healthcare Systems and Practices 1
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement 1
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 4
- Co-authors
- Karine Chevreul (11 shared papers)Isabelle Durand‐Zaleski (5 shared papers)Marion Leboyer (4 shared papers)Philippe Vignon (1 shared paper)Pim Cuijpers (1 shared paper)Xavier Repessé (1 shared paper)Spyros Kolovos (1 shared paper)Maurits W. van Tulder (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- European Neuropsychopharmacology (2 papers)International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (1 paper)Psychiatry Research (1 paper)Quality of Life Research (1 paper)Innovation in Aging (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- FranceAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Amélie Prigent
15 papers receiving 265 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 12
- Biological Psychiatry 6
- Clinical Psychology 47
- Health 16
- Psychiatry and Mental health 28
Countries citing papers authored by Amélie Prigent
This map shows the geographic impact of Amélie Prigent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amélie Prigent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amélie Prigent more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amélie Prigent
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amélie Prigent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amélie Prigent. The network helps show where Amélie Prigent may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amélie Prigent, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 69 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 58 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 1 |
About Amélie Prigent
Amélie Prigent is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Health, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 270 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Child Abuse and Trauma (1 paper), Public Health and Social Inequalities (1 paper), Healthcare Systems and Practices (1 paper), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (1 paper) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (12 citations), Biological Psychiatry (6 citations), Clinical Psychology (47 citations), Health (16 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (28 citations). Amélie Prigent has collaborated with scholars based in France, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Karine Chevreul, Isabelle Durand‐Zaleski, Marion Leboyer, Philippe Vignon, Pim Cuijpers, Xavier Repessé, Spyros Kolovos, Maurits W. van Tulder, Cyril Charron and Judith E. Bosmans. Their work appears in journals such as European Neuropsychopharmacology, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Psychiatry Research, Quality of Life Research and Innovation in Aging.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.