Keith Chapman

64 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Keith Chapman
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Urban Studies 150
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 176
  • Strategy and Management 377
  • Economics and Econometrics 437
  • Business and International Management 23
Replace Börje Johansson with:
Börje Johansson Sweden
Dirk Fornahl Germany
Benjamín Coriat France
Richard P. Appelbaum United States
Catherine Beaudry Canada
Max Nathan United Kingdom
W. Richard Goe United States
Chris DeBresson Canada
Emanuela Marrocu Italy
Linda Low Singapore
Keith Chapman relative to Börje Johansson Sweden Börje Johansson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Börje Johansson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Chapman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Chapman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Chapman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Chapman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Chapman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Chapman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Chapman. The network helps show where Keith Chapman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keith Chapman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith Chapman Line = papers co-authored together Keith Chapman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002344
2 2003105
3 200499
4 198871
5 200359
6 200457
7 198855
8 198950
9 200539
10
Virgin coconut oil production manual for micro- and village-scale processing
200638
11 198836
12 200031
13 199628
14 196227
15 199422
16
Training manual for sweet sorghum
200021
17 201019
18 198916
19 199616
20 199314

About Keith Chapman

Keith Chapman is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, Plant Science, Political Science and International Relations and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (8 papers), Regional resilience and development (6 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (6 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (5 papers), Regional Development and Policy (5 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (3 papers), Global trade and economics (3 papers) and Geography Education and Pedagogy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (150 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (176 citations), Strategy and Management (377 citations), Economics and Econometrics (437 citations) and Business and International Management (23 citations). Keith Chapman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sri Lanka and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Cumbers, Danny MacKinnon, F. Cerrina, Barry Lai, R. A. Leigh, D. R. Walker, Richard B. Chalfant, Amy Glasmeier, Guiying Li and Amanda Hicks. Their work appears in journals such as Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Journal of Economic Entomology, Geoforum, Environment and Planning A Economy and Space and Geographical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact