Amanda Doty

26 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

Amanda Doty
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Family Practice 72
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 22
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 4
  • General Health Professions 69
  • Emergency Medicine 21
Replace João Macedo Coelho-Filho with:
João Macedo Coelho-Filho Brazil
Jaclyn K. Schwartz United States
Jeannette Guerrasio United States
Susan Glover Takahashi Canada
Christen E. Chalmers United States
Jacira dos Santos Oliveira Brazil
Constance LeBlanc Canada
Marguerite Daus United States
Jodi Herold Canada
Neil Angus United Kingdom
Amanda Doty relative to João Macedo Coelho-Filho Brazil João Macedo Coelho-Filho's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.1×
João Macedo Coelho-Filho · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Doty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Doty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Doty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Doty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Doty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Doty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Doty. The network helps show where Amanda Doty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Doty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Doty Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Doty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201638
2 201834
3 202030
4 201926
5 201724
6 202118
7 202216
8 202015
9 201814
10 201813
11 202213
12 202111
13 20188
14 20208
15 20187
16 20187
17 20186
18 20216
19 20195
20 20194

About Amanda Doty

Amanda Doty is a scholar working on Family Practice, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Emergency Medicine and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 26 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (9 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (2 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (72 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (22 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (4 citations), General Health Professions (69 citations) and Emergency Medicine (21 citations). Amanda Doty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Kristin L. Rising, Rhea E. Powell, Danielle M. McCarthy, Brendan G. Carr, Michael D. Lewek, Alexzandra T. Gentsch, Marianna LaNoue, David H. Salzman, Dimitrios Papanagnou and Kenzie A. Cameron. Their work appears in journals such as Patient Education and Counseling, Academic Medicine, BMC Endocrine Disorders, Journal of Healthcare Management and Journal of Emergency Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact