Amanda Coupe

20 papers receiving 366 citations

Peers

Amanda Coupe
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Gender Studies 63
  • Family Practice 11
  • Applied Psychology 27
  • Human-Computer Interaction 32
  • Health 24
Replace Elizabeth D. Rosenman with:
Elizabeth D. Rosenman United States
Klodiana Kolomitro Canada
Francisco Iacobelli United States
Tabassum Rashid India
Rachel Cusatis United States
Hiroshi Sato Japan
Rebecca Weiss United States
Wellam F. Yu Ko Canada
Jordan M. Neil United States
María José Rementeria Spain
Amanda Coupe relative to Elizabeth D. Rosenman United States Elizabeth D. Rosenman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Elizabeth D. Rosenman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Coupe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Coupe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Coupe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Coupe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Coupe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Coupe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Coupe. The network helps show where Amanda Coupe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Coupe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Coupe Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Coupe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201674
2 200872
3 202139
4 201932
5 201920
6 201220
7 202019
8 202015
9 201014
10 202113
11 202012
12 202210
13 20209
14 20207
15 20254
16 20233
17 20233
18 20231
19 20221
20 20201

About Amanda Coupe

Amanda Coupe is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 369 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (3 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (2 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (2 papers) and Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (63 citations), Family Practice (11 citations), Applied Psychology (27 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (32 citations) and Health (24 citations). Amanda Coupe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michelle Drouin, Jody M. Ross, Tammy Toscos, Michael Mirro, Jessica Pater, John C. Mathers, Ian T. Johnson, Nigel J. Belshaw, Giles O. Elliott and J. Dainty. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, JCO Oncology Practice, International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Journal of Interpersonal Violence and Applied Clinical Informatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact