Rachel Cusatis
Impact in
- Computer Science Applications top 10%
- Online Learning and Analytics
- Education top 10%
- Online and Blended Learning
- Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
Papers in
-
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 5
- Co-authors
- Tanya Joosten (2 shared papers)Kathryn E. Flynn (19 shared papers)Dana Garbarski (2 shared papers)Bronwen E. Shaw (10 shared papers)Bradley H. Crotty (7 shared papers)Anita D’Souza (9 shared papers)Joni S. Williams (4 shared papers)Onur Asan (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (5 papers)Blood (4 papers)Cancer (2 papers)Journal of General Internal Medicine (2 papers)Quality of Life Research (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth AfricaBelgium
In The Last Decade
Rachel Cusatis
34 papers receiving 378 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Computer Science Applications 30
- Education 121
- Reproductive Medicine 25
- Family Practice 4
- Oncology 49
Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Cusatis
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Cusatis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Cusatis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Cusatis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Cusatis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Cusatis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Cusatis. The network helps show where Rachel Cusatis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rachel Cusatis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 118 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 34 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 4 |
About Rachel Cusatis
Rachel Cusatis is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Oncology, Hematology and Physiology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 391 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (5 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (3 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (3 papers), Online and Blended Learning (2 papers), Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies (2 papers), Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (2 papers) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (30 citations), Education (121 citations), Reproductive Medicine (25 citations), Family Practice (4 citations) and Oncology (49 citations). Rachel Cusatis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Tanya Joosten, Kathryn E. Flynn, Dana Garbarski, Bronwen E. Shaw, Bradley H. Crotty, Anita D’Souza, Joni S. Williams, Onur Asan, Jennifer E. Moore and Jay Sandlow. Their work appears in journals such as Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Blood, Cancer, Journal of General Internal Medicine and Quality of Life Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.