A.M. Codegoni

23 papers receiving 518 citations

Peers

A.M. Codegoni
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Reproductive Medicine 65
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 22
  • Oncology 138
  • Biotechnology 44
  • Cancer Research 61
Replace Anitta E. Pulkka with:
Anitta E. Pulkka Finland
Elizabeth Wilk United States
Farah Zia United States
Choh Hao Li United States
Fernand Labrie Canada
Lisa S. Beavers United States
Tracy Ediger United States
Beverly R. Akerman Canada
Natasha C. Lucki United States
Alicia R. Hovland United States
A.M. Codegoni relative to Anitta E. Pulkka Finland Anitta E. Pulkka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Anitta E. Pulkka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A.M. Codegoni

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A.M. Codegoni's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.M. Codegoni with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.M. Codegoni more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A.M. Codegoni

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.M. Codegoni. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.M. Codegoni. The network helps show where A.M. Codegoni may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside A.M. Codegoni, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A.M. Codegoni Line = papers co-authored together A.M. Codegoni links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200259
2 200255
3 199752
4 199149
5
Steroid receptors in epithelial ovarian carcinoma: relation to clinical parameters and survival.
198847
6 199736
7 199234
8 199232
9 200729
10 196421
11
Microsatellite instability and frameshift mutations in genes involved in cell cycle progression or apoptosis in ovarian cancer.
199920
12 199816
13 199815
14 199515
15 199913
16 199213
17 19808
18 19687
19 19674
20 19904

About A.M. Codegoni

A.M. Codegoni is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Reproductive Medicine and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 23 papers that have together received 537 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (3 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (3 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers), Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (2 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (2 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (65 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (22 citations), Oncology (138 citations), Biotechnology (44 citations) and Cancer Research (61 citations). A.M. Codegoni has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Massimo Broggini, A. Bizzi, Silvio Garattini, Maurizio D’Incalci, Sara Vignati, Federica Polato, Valter Torri, Tiziana Mennini, Silvio Caccia and Costantino Mangioni. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Cancer, Biochemical Pharmacology, British Journal of Cancer, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology and Annals of Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact