Allison Weber
Impact in
Papers in
- Genetics 6
- Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals 6
- Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock 2
-
- Genetics and Plant Breeding 3
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 2
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance 1
- Co-authors
- John Doebley (7 shared papers)Michael M. Magwire (2 shared papers)Robert R. H. Anholt (2 shared papers)Trudy F. C. Mackay (2 shared papers)José de Jesús Sánchez González (3 shared papers)Robert J. Schmidt (1 shared paper)Clinton Whipple (1 shared paper)Tesfamichael H. Kebrom (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Genetics (5 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)Genetics Research (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Occupational Therapy International (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesMexicoGermany
In The Last Decade
Allison Weber
10 papers receiving 603 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Aging 23
- Genetics 292
- Plant Science 372
- Agronomy and Crop Science 43
- Insect Science 51
Countries citing papers authored by Allison Weber
This map shows the geographic impact of Allison Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Allison Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Allison Weber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Allison Weber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Allison Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Allison Weber. The network helps show where Allison Weber may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Allison Weber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 202 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 105 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 69 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 59 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 57 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 53 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 39 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 7 |
About Allison Weber
Allison Weber is a scholar working on Genetics, Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Occupational Therapy and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 10 papers that have together received 614 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (6 papers), Genetics and Plant Breeding (3 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (2 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (2 papers), Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (1 paper), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (1 paper), Plant Gene Expression Analysis (1 paper) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (23 citations), Genetics (292 citations), Plant Science (372 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (43 citations) and Insect Science (51 citations). Allison Weber has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Germany. Frequent co-authors include John Doebley, Michael M. Magwire, Robert R. H. Anholt, Trudy F. C. Mackay, José de Jesús Sánchez González, Robert J. Schmidt, Clinton Whipple, Tesfamichael H. Kebrom, Fang� Yang and Robert Meeley. Their work appears in journals such as Genetics, PLoS ONE, Genetics Research, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Occupational Therapy International.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.