Occupational Therapy International

733 papers and 10.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 733 papers published in Occupational Therapy International in the last decades have received a total of 10.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Occupational Therapy International usually cover Occupational Therapy (335 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (272 papers) and Clinical Psychology (169 papers) specifically the topics of Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (295 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (197 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (103 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Occupational Therapy International are Virgil Mathiowetz, Jenny Ziviani, Mona Eklund, Denise Reid, Deok-Ju Kim, Byoung‐Hee Lee, Jodie Copley, Nicola J Spalding, Moya Kinnealey and Ted Brown.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Occupational Therapy International

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Occupational Therapy International. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Occupational Therapy International.

Countries where authors publish in Occupational Therapy International

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Occupational Therapy International. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Occupational Therapy International with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Occupational Therapy International more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025