Allison Moore

838 citations
10 papers · 180 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Allison Moore

10 papers receiving 176 citations

Peers

Allison Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Infectious Diseases 77
  • General Health Professions 63
  • Virology 10
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 38
  • Epidemiology 67
Replace Gisele R. de Oliveira with:
Gisele R. de Oliveira Brazil
Steven Dunham United States
D. Thomas United States
Anna Forbes United Kingdom
Gideon Loevinsohn United States
Subash Pathak United States
Véronique Paradis Canada
Kengo Oishi Japan
Rebecca Jones Italy
Anna DuVal United States
Allison Moore relative to Gisele R. de Oliveira Brazil Gisele R. de Oliveira's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Gisele R. de Oliveira · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Allison Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Allison Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Allison Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Allison Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Allison Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Allison Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Allison Moore. The network helps show where Allison Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Allison Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Allison Moore Line = papers co-authored together Allison Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 201850
2 201332
3 201931
4 201530
5 202016
6 20228
7
Hereditary spherocytosis with hemolytic crisis during pregnancy. Treatment by splenectomy.
19765
8 20234
9 20213
10 20201

About Allison Moore

Allison Moore is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Infectious Diseases, Neurology, Epidemiology and Genetics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 180 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hereditary Neurological Disorders (5 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (3 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (3 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (2 papers), Neurological diseases and metabolism (1 paper), Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ (1 paper), HIV Research and Treatment (1 paper) and Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (77 citations), General Health Professions (63 citations), Virology (10 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (38 citations) and Epidemiology (67 citations). Allison Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Meena S. Ramchandani, Matthew R. Golden, Julia C. Dombrowski, Robert Harrington, Shireesha Dhanireddy, Sean Ekins, Jill Wood, McKenna C. Eastment, Kristin Beima‐Sofie and Emily R. Begnel. Their work appears in journals such as AIDS Patient Care and STDs, Gait & Posture, Drug Discovery Today, Open Forum Infectious Diseases and F1000Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact