Allison M. Bock

842 citations
40 papers · 476 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Allison M. Bock

38 papers receiving 461 citations

Peers

Allison M. Bock
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Statistics and Probability 131
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 165
  • Oncology 113
  • Education 132
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 75
Replace Faye Antoniou with:
Faye Antoniou Greece
Amy J. Hansen United States
Julie Thompson United States
Carrie R. Ball United States
Katherine Walsh United States
Marita Partanen Netherlands
Cherie Green Australia
Rebecca A. Marks United States
Chunjie Wang China
Rachel E. Lerner United States
Allison M. Bock relative to Faye Antoniou Greece Faye Antoniou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Faye Antoniou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Allison M. Bock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Allison M. Bock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Allison M. Bock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Allison M. Bock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Allison M. Bock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Allison M. Bock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Allison M. Bock. The network helps show where Allison M. Bock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Allison M. Bock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Allison M. Bock Line = papers co-authored together Allison M. Bock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201490
2 201337
3 201236
4 201633
5 202033
6 201633
7 202229
8 201322
9 201720
10 201518
11 201618
12 201314
13 201811
14 201911
15 202410
16 19947
17 20195
18 20255
19 20165
20 20175

About Allison M. Bock

Allison M. Bock is a scholar working on Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability and Education, having authored 40 papers that have together received 476 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (12 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (9 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (9 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (7 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (6 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (5 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (4 papers) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (131 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (165 citations), Oncology (113 citations), Education (132 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (75 citations). Allison M. Bock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Alycia M. Hund, David A. Knorr, Dan S. Kaufman, Kelly B. Cartwright, Robert Pasnak, Grzegorz S. Nowakowski, Yucai Wang, Michèle M. M. Mazzocco, Daniel J. Weisdorf and Patricia Ferrieri. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Hematological Oncology, Cognitive Development, Journal of Visualized Experiments and Journal of Medical Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact