Rachel E. Lerner

993 citations
20 papers · 477 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Rachel E. Lerner

20 papers receiving 373 citations

Peers

Rachel E. Lerner
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Applied Psychology 37
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 93
  • Social Psychology 123
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 76
  • Oncology 88
Replace Sarah Tomassetti with:
Sarah Tomassetti United States
Aaron J. Deutsch United States
Hua Ming China
Marion Maurel France
Juwon Lee United States
Johannes Huesing Germany
Pablo Luna Spain
Faye Antoniou Greece
Katherine Walsh United States
Amanda M. George Australia
Rachel E. Lerner relative to Sarah Tomassetti United States Sarah Tomassetti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Sarah Tomassetti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel E. Lerner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel E. Lerner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel E. Lerner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel E. Lerner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel E. Lerner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel E. Lerner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel E. Lerner. The network helps show where Rachel E. Lerner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rachel E. Lerner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rachel E. Lerner Line = papers co-authored together Rachel E. Lerner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2016113
2 202177
3 201974
4 202139
5 201638
6 200734
7 199419
8 202015
9 202113
10 202013
11 202012
12 202312
13 20039
14
Greenish, but with More Dimensions: A Framework for Identifying Binding Instruments of International Environmental Law
20202
15 20212
16 20221
17 20191
18 20161
19 20151
20 20221

About Rachel E. Lerner

Rachel E. Lerner is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Education, Social Psychology and Oncology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 477 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parental Involvement in Education (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (2 papers) and Estrogen and related hormone effects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (37 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (93 citations), Social Psychology (123 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (76 citations) and Oncology (88 citations). Rachel E. Lerner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Qatar and France. Frequent co-authors include Wendy S. Grolnick, Alessandra Caruso, Linda J. Burns, Heather A. Wakelee, Philip J. Stella, Suresh S. Ramalingam, David P. Carbone, Gregory J. Gerstner, Michaela Bowden and Preston D. Steen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Child and Family Studies, Blood, Bone Marrow Transplantation and Contemporary Educational Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact