Allison Ford
Impact in
- Physiology top 5%
- Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Applied Psychology top 10%
Papers in
- Physiology 20
- Smoking Behavior and Cessation 20
-
- Homelessness and Social Issues 12
- Co-authors
- Crawford S Moodie (18 shared papers)Anne Marie MacKintosh (20 shared papers)Gerard Hastings (8 shared papers)Linda Bauld (18 shared papers)Jennifer McKell (7 shared papers)Kathryn Bartle Angus (7 shared papers)Ann D. McNeill (2 shared papers)Douglas R. Eadie (10 shared papers)
- Journals
- Nicotine & Tobacco Research (9 papers)BMJ Open (5 papers)Tobacco Control (3 papers)International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2 papers)Addiction Research & Theory (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Allison Ford
53 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Physiology 734
- Applied Psychology 49
- Marketing 94
- Clinical Psychology 141
- Health 49
Countries citing papers authored by Allison Ford
This map shows the geographic impact of Allison Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Allison Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Allison Ford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Allison Ford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Allison Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Allison Ford. The network helps show where Allison Ford may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Allison Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 97 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 96 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 61 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 60 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 60 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 55 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 51 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 47 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 47 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 46 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 46 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 46 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 40 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 39 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 39 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 33 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 33 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 32 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 30 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 29 |
About Allison Ford
Allison Ford is a scholar working on Physiology, General Health Professions, Marketing, Applied Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (20 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (12 papers), Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends (5 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (4 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers) and Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (734 citations), Applied Psychology (49 citations), Marketing (94 citations), Clinical Psychology (141 citations) and Health (49 citations). Allison Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Crawford S Moodie, Anne Marie MacKintosh, Gerard Hastings, Linda Bauld, Jennifer McKell, Kathryn Bartle Angus, Ann D. McNeill, Douglas R. Eadie, Christine Valentine and Lorna J. Templeton. Their work appears in journals such as Nicotine & Tobacco Research, BMJ Open, Tobacco Control, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Addiction Research & Theory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.