Trish Cotter

932 citations
29 papers · 709 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Trish Cotter

28 papers receiving 694 citations

Peers

Trish Cotter
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Applied Psychology 253
  • Literature and Literary Theory 169
  • Physiology 390
  • Pharmacy 44
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 227
Replace Sarah Ray with:
Sarah Ray United States
Janne Scheffels Norway
Tesfa N. Alexander United States
Jennifer C. Morgan United States
Dannielle Kelley United States
Hannah Farrimond United Kingdom
Louise Marsh New Zealand
Linda Mowad United States
J. F. Thrasher United States
Rina Alcalay United States
Trish Cotter relative to Sarah Ray United States Sarah Ray's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Sarah Ray · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Trish Cotter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Trish Cotter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Trish Cotter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trish Cotter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Trish Cotter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Trish Cotter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Trish Cotter. The network helps show where Trish Cotter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Trish Cotter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Trish Cotter Line = papers co-authored together Trish Cotter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201182
2 201161
3 201150
4 201346
5 201343
6 201442
7 201140
8 201533
9 201131
10 201229
11 201327
12 200926
13 202023
14 201520
15 201019
16 201519
17 201219
18 202116
19 202116
20 200813

About Trish Cotter

Trish Cotter is a scholar working on Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Literature and Literary Theory, Applied Psychology and Pharmacy, having authored 29 papers that have together received 709 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (14 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (9 papers), Media Influence and Health (9 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (8 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (5 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (4 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (3 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (253 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (169 citations), Physiology (390 citations), Pharmacy (44 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (227 citations). Trish Cotter has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Donna Perez, Sally Dunlop, Melanie Wakefield, Sarah Durkin, Emily Brennan, Sandra Mullin, Megan Bayly, Wai Tak Hung, James F. Bishop and Anita Dessaix. Their work appears in journals such as Tobacco Control, Health Education Research, BMC Public Health, BMJ Global Health and Nutrients.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact