Allison E. Drew

960 citations
22 papers · 686 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Allison E. Drew

22 papers receiving 650 citations

Peers

Allison E. Drew
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Molecular Biology 442
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 112
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 66
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 81
  • Insect Science 55
Replace Yasuo Mukai with:
Yasuo Mukai Japan
Virginie Vervoort United States
Emily E. Hare United States
Hu Nie China
Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder United States
Jesper Brohede Sweden
John M. Peters United States
M. D'Antonio Italy
Yao D. Cai United States
Caroline Bacquet Ecuador
Allison E. Drew relative to Yasuo Mukai Japan Yasuo Mukai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Yasuo Mukai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Allison E. Drew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Allison E. Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Allison E. Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Allison E. Drew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Allison E. Drew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Allison E. Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Allison E. Drew. The network helps show where Allison E. Drew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Allison E. Drew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Allison E. Drew Line = papers co-authored together Allison E. Drew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017130
2 2015102
3 200077
4 200074
5 201755
6 200044
7 201239
8 200036
9 201533
10 200123
11 200322
12 201211
13 20058
14 20058
15 20116
16 20114
17 20004
18 20173
19 20153
20 20182

About Allison E. Drew

Allison E. Drew is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Insect Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 686 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer-related gene regulation (8 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (5 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (4 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (4 papers), Plant and animal studies (3 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (442 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (112 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (66 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (81 citations) and Insect Science (55 citations). Allison E. Drew has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Linda L. Werling, Charles F. Williams, Scott Ribich, Robert A. Copeland, J. Joshua Smith, Richard Chesworth, Heike Keilhack, Sarah K. Knutson, Melissa J. Merrick and Rosemary J. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Research, Environmental Entomology, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, ACS Chemical Biology and Blood.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact